Adaptive capacities are resources with dynamic attributes, a point to which we will return momentarily. “Engineering resilience” makes a system return to one pre-designed state or function after a disturbance, whereas “ecological resilience” allows for many possible desirable states that match the environment (Gunderson 2000). The resilience of systems, for example, depends upon one component of the system being able to change or adapt in response to changes in other components; and thus the system would fail to function if that component remained stable (Adger 2000; Klein et al. 2003). In fact, in some circumstances, stability (or failure to change) could point to lack of resilience.
The Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
Self-reported using questionnaire on resilience and quality https://www.cdcfoundation.org/howrightnow of life and measure of association (correlation coefficient/standardized regression coefficient) were included. The relationship between resilience and quality of life are acquired and assessed. Eight studies involving a total of 1439 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Studies were included if research reported measures of association with resilience, as assessed using self-reported resilience scale and quality of life.
Charting the data
Origins of the concept of resilience in mental health field and within the western and industrialized context are attributed to studies of youth in the 20th century who having experienced significant adversity were observed to have good outcomes. Investing in the resilience of individuals and investing early in the life course is seen as a powerful health promoting step with lifelong benefits including potential improvements in school, employment, and pro-social outcomes–as well as a possible ‘equalizer’ in socio-economic differences. Such heightened awareness cuts across different social policy sectors including health care, mental health, education, child and youth services, justice and even public security. Programs and interventions to promoting resilience should be complimentary to public health measures addressing the social determinants of health. A social determinants perspective on resilience and mental health is emphasized. Our fourth and final caveat, somewhat related to the previous one, is to caution against potential unwanted consequences of a resilience frame for research and practice in disaster mental health.
These findings may support the idea of flexible emotion regulation105 that a match between coping resources and resilience factors on the one hand and situational demands, on the other hand, might be key for successful coping25. While a large number of psychological variables were examined as individual resilience factors, the number of effect estimates per factor was small, suggesting that there is still little consensus on individual psychological resilience factors25,49, and many studies only examine a small number of factors. On the one hand, this is in line with previous claims22,25,69 that resilience factors often only show small associations with mental responses to stress. Research into social resilience factors – beyond social support – and societal resilience factors was rare and research into higher-order resilience mechanisms was almost absent. Evidence for other individual and social resilience factors (e.g., flexibility and socioeconomic status) as well as societal factors was almost absent.
- Special attention is given to the rise of telemedicine and mobile mental health apps, offering innovative solutions to bridge gaps in mental healthcare accessibility.
- This could be overcome by introducing communication strategies which emphasise the necessity of social support, but also highlights the need for additional measures to reduce residual risk .
- Every authentic connection you make, every supportive relationship you cultivate, contributes to a more resilient and flourishing world.
- Chronic mental health issues, if left unaddressed, can lead to a cascade of problems such as increased risk of substance abuse, social isolation, and higher mortality rates.
As resilience is a dynamic process, longitudinal studies are essential . Another study among 430 Chinese adolescents and the perceived impact of the pandemic showed both psychological distress and posttraumatic growth. An Italian study in 463 families during the first COVID-19 wave found a positive association between the child's resilience and wellbeing. The pandemic exposes the underlying causes of insecurity, social and economic consequences, and thus challenges the multiple systems contributing to resilience . Two cross-sectional studies reported on resilience in children and adolescents living in refugee camps 33▪,34.
